Mudball application of fertilizer

 

Mudball application of fertilizer

By Rizal A Gatica

 

 

Putting fertilizer in mudballs and then deep-placing these mudballs at the center of every four rice hills may seem a strange way of applying fertilizer. But experiments at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) show that the mudball technique (as it is called) is superior to other methods of application including broadcast, topdressing, and foliar spraying.

            Says Surajit K. De Datta, 40, head of the IRRI’s agronomy department which is conducting the experiments: “Applying fertilizer using the mudball technique results in significantly higher yields at lower fertilizer rates. You have to use 100 kilograms of fertilizer per hectare if you use the broadcast method during the dry season; using the mudball method, you apply only 60 kilograms – and save 40 percent fertilizer with no reduction in grain yield. And you save more fertilizer  during the rainy season, when you need only 30 kilograms of fertilizer per hectare instead of 60 kilograms of nitrogen needed when other methods are used. In addition, you fertilize only once if you use the mudball method, whereas you fertilize two or three times if you use the broadcast method.”

            IRRI experiments on mudballs began as early as 1966, but  intensified in 1973 when the supply of fertilizer dwindled.

Continue reading “Mudball application of fertilizer”

How to collect soil sample

How to collect soil sample

Soil contains nutrient elements in varying amounts. These elements usually become insufficient when the soil is continuously farmed. Nutrient supplements in the form of fertilizer are, therefore, required. The kind and amount of fertilizers to be applied to the soil can be determined through chemical nalysis of the soil.

Have your soil analyzed by regional or provincial soil laboratory nearest to your area for effective fertilizer use and increased crop production.

Continue reading “How to collect soil sample”

Fertilizer scam video 2

[youtube dFtzEN3Yq4I]

Part one

Fertilizer scam video Part 2…

The Philippines needs to import rice from other country because of low supply of rice in the local market. If you would ask farmers what is the problem most of them will say they have switch product or have stopped planting rice because of high inputs.

According to the government they are doing their best to improve the current situation. They are now creating some projects that would help the farmers. But is it for real? Yes it is possible in papers that the government had lay out some project . The question is, if it is really implemented.

Remember the Fertilizer Scam? I have stumble upon a youtube video about it and here is some details from the info box. Continue reading “Fertilizer scam video 2”

Fertilizer scam video

[youtube qQhoqP1OH7c]

The Philippines needs to import rice from other country because of low supply of rice in the local market. If you would ask farmers what is the problem most of them will say they have switch product or have stopped planting rice because of high inputs.

According to the government they are doing their best to improve the current situation. They are now creating some projects that would help the farmers. But is it for real? Yes it is possible in papers that the government had lay out some project . The question is, if it is really implemented.

Remember the Fertilizer Scam? I have stumble upon a youtube video about it and here is some details from the info box.

DA: Department of Anomaly?
Report by Maki Pulido

It was in 2005 when the foul odor of the fertilizer scam was sniffed by the public.

Allegations were raised against the Department of Agriculture whose funds amounting to P728 million were said to have been used to bankroll President Arroyo’s campaign in the 2004 elections.

Years later, the controversy has yet to be resolved when more questionable transactions were discovered. Funds of Quedancor, the department’s lending arm, reaching billions of pesos are alleged by the Commission on Audit to be missing. Individuals who were supposed to have received loans did not get any. There were also establishments documented to have received loans but when checked had questionable addresses.

What is behind these anomalies some of which have remained unresolved for years?

posted by:bualaw08